The Thanksgiving Post: The Last Waltz
November 24, 2011
After I take my pumpkin pie out of the oven and before I dive into solving the equation of x = y x 15 (+/- 30)–where y = weight in pounds and x equals total minutes in oven and (+/- 30) is the time it takes for any turkey to either come out absolutely perfect or, alternately, pink in the middle and black on the outside leading to a Thanksgiving where mashed potatoes will serve as the main course–I will take one of those minutes to reflect on my favorite Thanksgiving Day movie.
Thirty-five years ago, The Band decided to throw a little concert on Thanksgiving to commemorate the end of an era spent on the road. They opened up the Winterland Ballroom in San Francisco, served up a few thousand turkey dinners, and then played music all night with a bunch of their friends. And since one of their friends is Martin Scorsese, we all have the privilege of watching the night play out in the film, The Last Waltz.
The boys play nice on stage, which is just one reason The Last Waltz is one of the greatest concert films ever—fantastic for its footage of all these terrific musicians playing at their peak. But backstage it’s just another classic Thanksgiving, full of all the love and bitterness and age-old grievances that every family has after so many years stuck together. 
Robbie Robertson is the big mouth, commandeering every conversation and taking credit for whatever he can, while Levon Helm sits and smokes, interjecting wry comments in a slow, careful drawl, barely containing the loathing for his blowhard brother behind a polite, Southern smile. Rick Danko is your happy-go-lucky ameliorator—the middle kid I guess—who drinks too much and plays the sad clown, wishing everyone could just get along, and Richard Manuel and Garth Hudson are your classic bachelor brothers, shy and eccentric and in the shadows.
Every other guy in the concert is a cousin or long-lost uncle—from Ronnie Hawkins and Dr. John to Neil Young and Van Morrison—and every other girl is singing backup or hiding out in the kitchen (except for Joni Mitchell, who of course is the exotic, astonishing aunt that everyone’s a little in awe of). Neil Diamond is there just so everyone can whisper “Who invited that guy?” before Bob Dylan comes out to lead a heartfelt and satisfying sing-along before we all escape back home.
So if you’re looking for reasons to slip away from your own family for a few moments today, or if you’re on your own this holiday, waxing nostalgic (or not) for Thanksgivings gone by, take a minute for The Last Waltz. Thanks to You Tube you can watch pretty much the entire movie in a series of three-minute clips, so I’ll leave you with my favorite for today—in memory of Rick Danko and Richard Manuel—because every Thanksgiving should begin with a moment of silence for those who won’t be pulling up a chair to the table.
Happy Thanksgiving.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6QxPkXzEQ4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqJJdiG61jo
Thanks Gerry
October 18, 2011
My friend and teacher, Gerry Shapiro, would have laughed at my last blog, a recounting of a near-death experience with a vacuum that was as pathetic as it was unspectacular. Ezra Pound might have waxed tragic about life slipping by like a field mouse not shaking the grass (before we meet our end in a stupid and embarrassing fashion), but that’s precisely what Gerry would find funny about our time here on earth.
When I heard Gerry had died, I was reminded again of how he delighted in exploiting those neuroses in fiction, creating characters who worried so much about everything that they inevitably pitched headlong into horribly awkward situations entirely of their own making, the theory being that the best way to excise fears is by making their worst nightmares come true.
I also thought of how much I learned from Gerry and how productive I was under his tutelage—in Gerry’s classes I wrote what became the first chapter of My Brief History of Sex Education as well as several short stories that will become the basis for my next book once I put this first one behind me. One reason I flourished was because Gerry recognized in me another anxious, uptight soul, but more important was that he taught me—in class and with his writing—how essential it is to create the imperfect person.
My early stories were full of naïve and helpless characters—people who rode the waves of life in a near-constant state of befuddled surprise—and Gerry was remarkably patient with them and with me. But soon I learned—from Gerry the teacher and Gerry the writer—that it’s also important to show the dark side of your characters.
The characters in Gerry’s stories—my favorite creation of his was Leo Spivak—can be charming and ingratiating and funny, but then the page turns, the mood shifts, and that other side comes out. The vindictive side, the vengeful side, the side that makes a reader catch her breath and say, “Did Leo really just do that?” (And I won’t tell you what Leo does—just read Bad Jews or watch The King of the Corner and you’ll quickly see what I mean.)
One question we often try to answer—in fiction or memoir or life—is why bad things happen to good people. And that’s probably the question I began with when I wrote my first stories for Gerry’s classes—but the trickier and more interesting questions Gerry forced me to tackle are why good people do bad things to other good people and why on earth they’re forgiven after they do. They’re certainly questions I had to face in My Brief History of Sex Education because despite my early fondness for the befuddled ingénue, I have certainly been responsible for more than a few moral failings myself. It would be disingenuous if not outright deceitful to pretend that I had been an innocent, and the book is far better for it.
What I also learned from Gerry is that the reason we are so often granted forgiveness—and the reason we grant it ourselves—is because our lives are left unfinished. There’s always another chapter, there’s always another edition, there’s always another revision. So we grant others the chance we want ourselves—the chance to finally get it right. Gerry told me he used to agonize over his stories that had been published in literary magazines—he’d read them over and over and beat himself up over typos or mistakes or stilted dialogue or endings he wished he’d rewritten—until he realized that the publication was just one more stage in the process. “I can fix it before the book comes out,” he said. “It’s not the end of the world.” And he was right. We can endlessly revise our stories and our lives.
And I don’t think death ends that process of revision, that chance for redemption. Gerry won’t be continuing Leo Spivak’s story here on earth, but Leo’s story—like Gerry’s, like mine and yours—will continue because there’s an infinite chance for another story, another chapter, another chance for forgiveness. (And yes, Gerry often commented on my habit of repetition—“Kate, you have a way of repeating words and phrases over and over—it works sometimes, but sometimes it really doesn’t. Keep an eye on that.”)
So Gerry’s friends will continue his work—his fellow writers, his students, and of course the wonderful writer and teacher Judith Slater, his wife—and we will write that next chapter, we will write that next story. And others will follow us when we leave our own work unfinished. And all of us—and the characters we create—will continue to make mistakes and do bad things to good people and hope to forgive and be forgiven for our imperfections. But for now we will miss you Gerry. . . thank you.
Life Intervenes
October 14, 2011
Yesterday morning as I was vacuuming for probably the first time in a couple of months, my silk scarf was suddenly sucked up into the machine, yanking the hell out of my neck and giving me a pretty crummy wake up call. “Are you kidding me?” I thought. “I’m going to die doing housework?” At least Isadora Duncan was riding in an open top car in Nice when her scarf led to her downfall. 
I know we’ve all had these fatal visions: choking on a Dunkin’ Munchkin, running off the road while fiddling with the radio, being run off the road while riding your bike or walking your dog. And we’re certain our last thoughts will be some variation of Why didn’t I? Why didn’t I check the weather? Why didn’t I stay home? Why didn’t I chew more thoroughly? Why didn’t I listen to my mom? You can fill in the blank.
So I spent the rest of the morning rubbing my neck and contemplating the unsettling phrase, “She died doing what she loved,” and then I wondered if I’d ever get my act together and finish editing my book so if I did in fact die doing what I loved I’d have something to leave behind other than a partially cleaned rug. I recently gave an interview to a magazine I used to screen fiction for where I said, once again, that I was in the final stages of finishing my book and I needed to get ready to send it off. Admitting that made me a little queasy. I’d planned on sending it off a year ago. A year ago. 
A phrase I often like to use whenever I get stuck in the writing process is Life Intervenes, as if that’s an excuse for anything. Life intervenes for all of us in some way—we move, we take new jobs, or we get married or we have kids or we get sick or the kids get sick or the parents get sick or a tree falls on the roof or the water heater explodes—you know what I mean.
And then a scarf gets caught in the vacuum cleaner or a big bite of burrito clogs the airways and I’m quickly reminded that everything I do is life, whether it’s flossing my teeth or watching my son’s first cross-country meet or going to the library with my daughter to find just one more book to read rather than working on my own. And once again I tell myself to get my act together, to face the truth that’s there’s a limit to how long I can keep my nose buried in the laptop before I have to admit the book’s as good as it’s going to get and if it gets accepted or rejected it’s not going to be because I have a perfectly placed semi-colon on page 172.
So I will do my best. In the meantime, here’s that interview I just gave, posted on the Ploughshares blog http://word.emerson.edu/ploughshares/2011/10/05/an-interview-with-ploughshares-senior-reader-kate-flaherty/ where I discuss editorial pet peeves, egalitarian reading tastes, and how strange it seems now to have grown up in the pre-Internet, pre-blog age.
Your Label Here: Another Reunion Post
July 19, 2011
I woke up yesterday with a nagging feeling of dread—my high school reunion is coming up this weekend and I really don’t want to go. It seems silly to whine about a high school reunion because it’s not like school—I don’t actually have to go. A truant officer is not going to collar me and threaten to throw me into a high school reunion detention center if I don’t drag myself to the party and engage in reminiscing over bad fashion choices and cheesy music and questionable late night behavior.
Then again I do have to go—at least this year—because I live only an hour-and-a-half away and I was best friends in high school with two-thirds of the reunion committee. If I didn’t go, they would serve as the high school reunion truant officers, dragging me through the door. But truthfully, reunions aren’t that bad—especially if I look at them the same way I look at exercise—something I have to talk myself into, because I’ll end up thinking “That wasn’t so bad, now was it?” and feeling a little better when I’m done.
So I decided to gear up for the weekend by watching a YouTube clip here and there of my favorite high school reunion scenes, where I made the disturbing discovery that almost every reunion plotline involves either lying and subterfuge if not outright fraud. And so I wondered—does high school trauma run so deep that we obsess over returning in triumph to something as seemingly insignificant as a high school reunion, or does it just make for an easy screenplay story? As I think back on reunions I’ve actually gone to rather than watched on the screen, I think the former might be true. In high school it’s easy to feel like we’ve been slapped with a label, and even if (or especially if) that label is all in our heads, we’re going to want to go back and prove, without a doubt, that we’re no longer that same loser/jerk/jock/nerd/snob/slut that everyone thought we were. And perhaps that’s why I began the memoir I wrote—a memoir that’s set almost entirely in high school—because I felt the need to set my own record straight.
But what I discovered—in writing the book and in reconnecting with friends at reunions and elsewhere—is that there really isn’t much to straighten out. A label is just a label and those can be changed as often as we change tires or hairstyles or underwear, so going to a high school reunion with an embellished story or in a rented sports car or with a newly dyed head of hair is pretty meaningless. Who we were in high school is who we are now. While the labels might fall away—as I discover the snob was painfully shy or the jerk was getting tooled on at home, I might also find the jerk is still a jerk and the loser has lost it completely—I think our characters stay the same.
The problem is that, just like in high school, I think most of us still don’t completely know who we are or what we want or what we can’t admit we’re afraid of. So as often as we try to escape labels, we also cling to them like we might cling to the idea that having the right car or occupation or pair of shoes will somehow help say whatever it is that we can’t. Instead of saying we still don’t have a clue, we’ll share pictures of our families and swap stories of our lives and our struggles and our adventures as if to say, “You’ll have to figure it out for yourself, because frankly, I’m stumped.”
So as I consider what I’ll wear and what I’ll say next weekend, as well as whether to color the gray from my hair—I’ll leave you with that list of my favorite scenes, if only because music and movies also serve as labels of sorts, saying whatever we can’t.
- Grosse Pointe Blank
When I say that our characters stay the same, that doesn’t mean every guy who stood up his prom date is a hitman waiting to happen, but who knows. . . This movie also has both a terrific soundtrack (and great soundtracks, like the theme of lying, also is quite common in reunion movies) and the best—and most literal—“you can’t go home again” scene.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WgLr6qlpec4
Yes, this movie could easily be classified as a chick flick and it does have a bit of bizarre sci-fi business Alan Cumming must have brought with him from the Spy Kids franchise, but what can I say? It’s your classic fairy tale story of the high school nerds hitting their peak long after high school ends, plus Janeane Garofalo lurking around the corner whenever the plot gets too saccharine.
- The “Reunion” episode of 30 Rock
It’s a little troubling for me to include this, mainly because several friends have compared me to Tina Fey either because we share unfortunate taste in eyewear and fashion sense and mouse-brown hair or because we have a similar sense of humor (sadly we share nothing in terms of artistic success—but I’m not dead yet). What disturbs me about this episode is that Liz/Tina goes back to her reunion believing she’d been this witty nerd who’d flown beneath the radar only to discover she’d been the class bully. . . but since I’ve only had one post-high school experience where an old classmate drunkenly informed me, “You know what? I never liked you,” I hold out hope that I’m not the jerk who’s still a jerk.
- Something Wild
Not Jonathan Demme’s best movie, and not really a reunion movie, but with the best reunion scene—because how can any high school reunion go wrong if The Feelies are the band!
- Music and Lyrics
Again, not a reunion movie, but the reunion scene is brilliant in evoking that strange emotional mixture of pleasure and boredom and pain that is the high school reunion—and Hugh Grant, as an aging pop star, is brilliant in emulating the absolute cheesy nature of eighties pop. 
The High School Reunion Update: 300 Words or Less
July 6, 2011
I recently was asked to contribute a brief bio for my upcoming high school reunion, and while I have been working on a memoir for more years than I care to admit, may I say that I look forward to writing things like this about as much as I’d look forward to writing a yearly Christmas letter, where every statement seems to require an exclamation point and all news is good news.
I revel in good news—don’t get me wrong—I love the joy of graduations and state championships and blue ribboned art projects, I love new jobs and new babies and new driver’s licenses and straight A report cards. But I also love the truth of life—bad backs and fender benders and midlife crises, the smaller triumphs of finding a great pair of jeans at the thrift store or picking five bucks off of the sidewalk.
And most of all I love revelations, like figuring out that croissant is the French word for crescent because the pastry is
shaped like the new moon, or determining that four-year-olds can still be amazed by the fact that red paint and blue paint make purple, or finally decoding that The Clash aren’t singing “stand by me” in their song, but instead “you didn’t stand by me,” a discovery that just makes you want to lie down on the floor and cry because true disappointment really does hit you lightning-quick that way.
So while I was unable to bring myself to write a proper bio, I was able to submit this small paragraph for my Gilford High School Reunion Booklet. There are no exclamation points or pieces of actual news, but everything below is completely true:
Katie Flaherty–Gilford Middle High School–What Has She Been Up To?
Over the years I’ve stuck my nose where it didn’t belong, acquired sunburns and poison ivy in uncomfortable places, walked my dog, wondered how the heck I got here, complained about my co-workers, yelled at my kids, ate squid tacos and tongue tacos and tacos al carbon and more Grape Nut ice cream than I could ever measure, drank too much coffee and wine and Diet Coke, ignored surgeon general’s warnings, finished all my vegetables, believed God was my DJ, camped on the beach, fell asleep on the couch, watched bad TV, danced the Polka, put pennies on railroad tracks, read cheesy books and great books and annoying books and far too many books I wish I’d written myself, been shocked and jealous and panicked and pathetic and proud and devastated and deliriously happy, been a sucker for the corporate ploy, plucked my furniture from the city dump, saw great bands and crappy bands and bands that were somehow both at once, went to the opera and wondered what the heck the hype was all about, been underpaid and overworked, demanded my money back, had my heart ground to dust on the sidewalk and then swept up and put back together, had poppy seeds and parsley and popcorn stuck in my teeth, drooled on my pillow, cried at the movies, got blisters from new shoes, and hugged my kids, grateful still to be here in this world.
This morning I began reading Patti Smith’s memoir Just Kids; I know I’m a little behind the times, but in the spirit of my grandmother who rarely went to movies at the theater, claiming “Everything makes it onto TV if you wait long enough,” I tend to wait until books are not just in paperback, but in paperback and at the used bookstore. . . so yesterday was the day for Patti Smith.
I have alternately loved and feared Patti Smith ever since I heard “Pissing in a River” on the soundtrack of Times Square, one of the best movies of all time for any girl stuck in a small town who suspects there’s a wider world out there.
Patti Smith is scary to me because she’s fearless and open, and while I admire her, I’m also afraid I might never achieve that level of honesty myself. Times Square sets out to be that kind of movie too–one that celebrates being bold enough to embrace life with all its edges and imperfections and while the movie is far from perfect–its version of Times Square in the early eighties is more fairy-tale funky than gritty reality–it mirrors what Smith writes about how it’s necessary to escape into art and books and especially music in order to survive adolescence. As we age, our tastes might expand and refine–or in the case of some stay completely stagnant–but I think any later musical or literary discoveries will lack that same sense of release that comes in adolescence when everything is new and raw and exciting.
But I’d barely gotten through twenty pages of her memoir when I was struck–as I often am–by how antiseptic and stale culture has become since we left those gritty seventies and early eighties behind. I came of age then, and while I grew up with the main elements of a fairly restrictive, closed culture–Catholic girl in a small town, pre-cable TV, pre-Internet, too far away for even a decent radio signal–I also had the freedoms that came with living in a small town where kids were allowed to discover much of the world on their own rather than having it handed to them in a shiny shrink-wrapped package. But the world shifted in the mid- ’80s when the culture as a whole entered the era of AIDS, and suddenly those laughable plots about the sexually promiscuous dying horrible deaths–like in Friday the 13th and Halloween and Carrie–were now coming true. And because I believe all art, all culture, is undeniably connected with sex and love and how they interact, I think AIDS changed not only how we view sex and love and intimacy, but also how we create art. The age of AIDS awareness might have caused culture to look more deeply into how intimacy connects with sex, but instead culture seemed to retreat even farther into the disconnect by sanitizing sex, slapping a condom on it and retreating from any skin-to-skin contact altogether. 
And what’s the result in the 21st Century? I’d say we did such a good job at scrubbing and cleaning and protecting ourselves from any possible pain or discomfort or disease that we’ve smoothed away all the edges of art whatsoever. Instead of looking forward, culture endlessly looks backward, trying to recreate the earlier eras–the’50s, ’60s, ’70s, and now ’80s–but it’s as if everything’s been run through a computer and perfected to such a degree that nothing seems real anymore.
Artists are so busy playing it safe, there’s little life left at all, and yet has life itself really gotten cleaner and safer? Hardly–if anything, the culture that hides behind that perfectly marketed, contrived and pre-packaged facade is dangerous. Sex has gotten younger and more child-like and even farther away from the intimacy it should be connected with, and just like the young faces we see on television and in the movies have been smoothed out thanks to the injection of plastic or poisonous toxins–what hides behind the bright, shiny veneer festers and smolders into a troublesome deviance.
I know I’ll read of deviance in Smith’s memoir too, as she gets farther into her relationship with Robert Mapplethorpe, a polarizing artist who took his series of sexually graphic photographs because he “was looking for the unexpected. . . looking for something that had never been seen before”–always a dangerous motive. But art should be dangerous, art should be unexpected. And while Mapplethorpe’s images were arresting, they almost seem quaint in 2011, and they are completely devoid of either the quirk factor or the gawker, post-car crash shock element that passes for so much of what’s defined as art today when art pretends it’s not playing safe.
But as I write about the state of culture in the 21st Century, I wonder how much I am part of this problem, mainly because I have this manuscript I keep noodling and tinkering with, hoping to make it “perfect,” when what I really might be doing is killing it altogether. I’m not a fan of sloppy writing, but that’s different than being messy, different than being dirty. A clean and perfect book is dull, just like a clean and perfect song is entirely forgettable. I want messy memoirs and novels, and I want funky music, and I want art that makes me take notice without requiring the shock of deviance. I have faith that we will get fed up with being spoon-fed on the fake reality show that is our culture right now. I have found a few of those writers and artists and musicians, and I have faith that there are more, just like I have faith that this antibiotic-obsessed era can’t last.
I will end with a shameless plug for some of those musicians I have faith in–Liz Pappademas and the Level–and not just because Liz is my cousin, though in art nepotism usually hurts rather than helps. . . but Liz takes a good look at a peculiar part of our shallow culture–the game show–with her new album, Television City. I think she and her band do a pretty good job at pulling back the curtain (or pulling off the condom) in the 21st Century, and while I kinda wish she’d offered up one of her feistier tunes as her free video, below find the link and enjoy:
http://www.youtube.com/user/plazaismapped#p/a/u/0/LfcrQRVlbaE
On the Bruins and Bachelor Uncles
June 18, 2011
I am hardly a die-hard hockey fan, but I am compelled to write at least a few words on the Boston Bruins winning their first Stanley Cup Championship since 1972. In 1972, I actually lived in Boston, but I was only three and my earliest memories were not of hockey but of going to sleep with the sound of horns and sirens and the strange light shows caused from headlights skittering their way across my bedroom ceiling. The only sport I knew then was candlepin bowling because I got to tag along with my mother to her league where I was rewarded with a glazed chocolate donut for sitting still through one string after another.
Hockey entered my life only after my family left Boston for New Hampshire, not because I was suddenly out of the city and enjoying the sport on a frozen, wintery pond, but because we continued to come back to Massachusetts to visit my grandmother who still had at least two or three of her six sons living at home whenever they weren’t doing stints in the Army, and all of them were Bruins fans.
My dad was the oldest of eight—six boys, two girls—and the age spread was great enough that Dad’s youngest brothers
were more like big brothers to my own brother Kevin and me. The three youngest—Joe, Sean, and Michael—had set up a lair in the basement of my grandmother’s apartment, and my brother Kevin and I loved sitting down there amidst the sticky beer mugs and lacrosse sticks and record albums stacked against the wall, gorging ourselves on Wise Potato Chips and soda and all the television we were never allowed to watch at home.
Though Kevin and I often were subjected to the losing end of a tickle attack or wrestling match when we overstayed our welcome in the basement, for the most part our uncles were a fairly quiet bunch, especially when they watched television. When our uncles were accommodating, Kev and I got to watch Tom and Jerry and The Monkees and H.R. Puffinstuff, but more often our uncles were in charge and we watched endless hours of Hogan’s Heroes, Three Stooges, and the Saturday Creature Double Feature plus, of course, Bruins games whenever they were on.
I never learned much about the game or the players, I just remember my uncles with their black and gold scarves and their Bruins beer mugs and their shouts of disgust or cheers depending on how the game was going. I elicited a shout of disgust myself, when, one night, I came down the basement steps with one of those Bruins mugs full of milk.
As soon as he spotted me on the stairs, Joe cried out, “What are you doing drinking milk out of Sean’s mug! You can’t ever drink beer out of a mug once it’s had milk in it!”
“I’m sorry,” I said, “I didn’t know.”
“He’ll never be able to drink beer out of it again,” Joe said, and as my eyes got wide, the tears probably soon to follow, Sean piped up.
“That’s okay,” Sean said. “I guess it’s your mug now.”
It seems silly now to think I’d taken Joe so seriously, just like it was silly of me to believe Joe would know it was Sean’s Bruins mug I’d supposedly ruined and not his or Michael’s when they all looked the same, but taking advantage of my naïveté was just another way they had fun with Kevin and me, especially since, as the youngest of eight, they’d probably been the butt of jokes more than once themselves. As I look back at that time I think too I was so young that the memory of what I saw on the television—the Three Stooges, John Wayne, and the Bruins players who might have been tough on the boards but who, in post-game interviews, seemed uncomfortable and awkward—somehow blended together with all my memories of hanging out in that basement with Kevin and my bachelor uncles. Joe, Sean, and Michael were the Three Stooges and John Wayne and those tough and loyal hockey players who were shy if not downright reserved off the ice, and at the end of the day they were the first stand-up guys I knew besides my dad. 
Those years with my bachelor uncles are far behind me—Michael just retired from the Army after decades of service and has two kids who, not surprisingly, aren’t too much older than my own two kids, Joe now lives up in New Hampshire while I’m in Massachusetts again, and Sean, sadly, died too young more than ten years ago. Sean didn’t get to see the Bruins bring the Cup back to Boston this year, but I hope he was rooting for them somewhere, drinking beer from a mug that’s never been tainted with milk even once.
I only watched Game 7 of the Stanley Cup Championship; I couldn’t bring myself to watch the playoffs sooner, because it had been a long time since I’d watched any professional sports game. After following the Red Sox for years, I became disenchanted with the overly polished and entitled attitudes of too many of the players—in baseball, in basketball, wherever, but finally I caved and turned on Game 7.
Immediately I was taken back in time thanks to a pre-game interview with Patrice Bergeron, the Bruins’ Alternate Captain. Bergeron was wearing an ill-fitting suit and an unfortunate tie, and his hair and beard looked as though they’d been cut with a dull pair of gardening shears. He seemed uncomfortable as he gamely answered questions in that thick Quebecois accent that most people outside of New England would think was a language other than English, but I suspected—correctly—that once he got onto the ice all awkwardness would be lost. That night he scored two of the four Bruins goals, and he was just as effective on the boards too; I was thrilled to watch him pull of his helmet and form a celebratory scrum with all the other shaggy, sweaty guys out there once the game was over and the title secured.
While I suspect if I watched an entire season of NHL hockey, I’d find enough reason to become as disillusioned as I am with pretty much every other professional sport out there today, Game 7 left me happy. That night it was as if the Bruins were a team of my bachelor uncles—stand-up guys who, this year at least, deservedly came out on top.
First, Get Rid of the Parents
June 15, 2011
This weekend I saw Super 8, a great little movie where the director, J.J. Abrams, basically throws E.T. and Stand By Me into a blender, adds a pinch of Dawn of the Dead horror show kitsch, and then whips in the most important element to any fairy tale action adventure—he kills off the mom from the get-go.
My kids and I agree that any halfway decent adventure story begins with first getting rid of the mom, sometimes the dad, and better yet both parents entirely. Do I have to list the examples? Star Wars, Harry Potter, James and the Giant Peach, and pretty much any fairy tale you could come up with. It’s such a joke at my house, Emily sometimes shouts out while she’s reading, “Hey Mom, this book is getting good—the mom just died!” And sure enough, J.J. Abrams—who proved in Lost that the conventions of fiction and fantasy run through his veins—kicks off Super 8 with the mom’s funeral. And so the adventure begins. . .
The memoir I’m still struggling to polish up and publish does not include a funeral—my mom was very much alive back then, as she is alive now—thankfully!—but the story I write does begin the same year my mom first took a fulltime job and my parents also began working a lot of nights trying to start their own business to make ends meet.
It was 1979 and the economy stank, so they had little choice, and while my grandmother lived with us too, my brother and I were usually left to our own devices, as were a lot of our friends whose parents were also sucked into a black hole of work and responsibility. No one was dead, no one disappeared, but it seemed parents were suddenly ghost-like and peripheral, and we kids were happy with our newfound freedoms.
The adventures we had in those times sometimes were minor and sometimes were sketchy, but all of them depended on the basic framework that all such shenanigans require—bravado, independence, and a touch of stupidity on the case of the teenagers, plus that healthy helping of benign neglect from the parents.
That phrase “benign neglect,” comes from my friend and fellow writer Ladette Randolph, and she uses it to describe how she managed—in no particular order—to mother her kids while she also wrote, worked, and stayed sane. Ladette’s idea is that sometimes leaving adolescents to direct their own lives is not only benevolent, but often necessary—whether it’s continuing to throw them outside every day, letting them fend for themselves in the kitchen, not demanding they check in every hour, and telling them every now and again they have to make their own way home. It’s a difficult and scary balance to sort out, especially when parents don’t have a choice, which in today’s economy—about as lousy as it was in 1979—is pretty much most parents including me. 
But the upside of that benign neglect is opportunity for adventure—or at least a life less managed—for kids today. And while their independence might not necessarily lead to a Super 8 style of adventure involving M-80s and zombies and an alien slightly less benevolent than E.T.—it also shouldn’t require the death of one or more parents in order to get jump started.
And despite the fact that my kids are caught up in their own adventures, my daughter Emily has recently taken the time to nag me over the fact that I haven’t so much neglected my blog these past few months as I have completely abandoned it. Perhaps with Emily’s careful attention and prodding, I’ll do a better job making more posts. We’ll see. . .
School’s Out . . . for Winter
January 21, 2011
As I sit here in the early winter dark, having received the call that schools have been closed today and my services will not be required, I consider the mixture of anticipation and activity, boredom and patience, as well as the obligatory heavy, hard work, that a proper snow day imparts.
And let me say that today—with a few inches dusting the sidewalk that did not in any way prevent me from taking my dog Charley on his morning walk, did not prevent the bakery on the corner of my block from opening and tempting me, as always, with the smell of fresh gingerbread muffins, and will not prevent me from hopping into my car in a few hours to go into school and pick up some work I need to finish—today is not a snow day.
A proper snow day is when everyone stays home and everyone is off the roads except for snowplow drivers, guys in trucks driving to the public works so they can start their work as snowplow drivers, and the occasional idiot in a Jeep Cherokee or a Subaru who thinks doing an unexpected 360˚ spin on I-93 is somehow entertaining. And why is everyone off the roads on a proper snow day? Because there would be a twelve-to-twenty-four inch thick blanket that we’d need half the day to clear from our long New Hampshire driveways and half the day to recover from. Alternately, a proper snow day would not include snow at all, but instead a one inch sheet of ice on everything that meant we weren’t going anywhere until it warmed up enough for us to head into our yards and start clearing away all the fallen birch trees and broken pine boughs.
But I live in Massachusetts now, so today is just a day that school has been cancelled, and by ten o’clock kids will be sledding or building snowmen or playing Wii in their basements while parents go out to run errands or do laundry or seclude themselves in their offices because they’re “working from home” and end up surfing Hulu and watching an entire season or two of Arrested Development or Lost. By twelve o’clock the streets will be full of Domino’s Pizza delivery drivers and teenagers going to the 12-plex and soon enough the day will be over.
And it’s not so bad, this unexpected holiday, at least until June when it’s seventy-five degrees out and sunny, and we’re all wondering why the heck we’re still stuck inside the classroom when our brains have checked out weeks before. And that’s where patience has to kick in, just like it has to kick in on a real snow day, when the sledding’s done and the cocoa’s drunk and you’re just staring out the window almost wishing you could be in class, because at least being in class isn’t nearly as boring as staring out the window at plowed roads and the Domino’s guy zipping by in his dented old Corolla.
But right now the snow’s still falling and it’s still a little dark and Charley’s sitting here at my feet chewing ice balls from his paws. I don’t have to shovel just yet and I don’t have anywhere to be, so proper snow day or not, I might as well enjoy it.






















